AI-native development for teams of 5–40

From idea to pull request. Your developers just approve.

We give your team a coding agent with everything it needs to go from request to ready-to-merge PR, on your existing codebase. People stay in charge of the decisions; the agent does the rest. Two weeks, fixed scope, measured before and after.

Book a 30-minute demo See packages

Installing the tool takes an hour. The workflow around it is where teams stall.

01

Uneven usage

A few engineers fly, most barely touch it, and everyone has a different personal setup.

02

Explaining the same thing again

Every new chat starts from zero. Conventions and past decisions get re-explained, or ignored.

03

No proof it works

Leadership pays for licenses but can't point to faster delivery or fewer bugs.

What we build

Three pieces that turn AI tools into a delivery system.

Core

The almighty coding agent

An agent wired into your repo, tickets, tests and CI, with everything it needs to go from an approved idea to a pull request. Your developer arrives when it's ready, reviews, and approves.

Core · org-wide add-on

Self-learning decision wiki

Every decision your team makes is logged once, approved by a person, and followed by every agent from then on.

Decide once. Never explain it again.

Add-on

Issues intake where you already talk

Anyone can raise a bug or feature request from Slack or email. It becomes a structured spec, and your tech team approves it before any code is written.

How it flows

From a Slack message to a merged PR, with people deciding where it counts.

Your product tool (Jira, Linear, Monday, GitHub Issues and others) is integrated into every step and updates itself. Nobody moves tickets by hand.

  1. 1 · anyoneRequestA bug or idea arrives by Slack or email.Ticket created
  2. 2 · agentSpecIt becomes a spec and plan an agent can execute.Spec attached to ticket
  3. 3 · tech teamApproveAn engineer signs off before any code is written.Status: Approved
  4. 4 · agentBuildThe coding agent implements, tests and opens the PR.Status: In progress · branch linked
  5. 5 · CIAI reviewAutomated checks catch agent mistakes first.PR and check results linked
  6. 6 · developerApprove & mergeA focused review of what needs judgment.Status: Done

Every approval feeds the decision wiki, so the next spec starts from everything your team has already decided.

Packages

Fixed scope, fixed price. Start with a demo.

Start here · 30 min

Live demo

Free
  • Watch the agent take a real request from idea to PR
  • See the approval gates and decision wiki in action
  • Talk through how it would fit your codebase
  • Leave with a clear recommendation of where to start
Book a demo
2 weeks

Core Sprint

₪32,000 + VAT
  • Coding agent from approved idea to PR
  • Product tool integrated and updated at every step
  • Spec, plan and approval gates
  • AI PR review wired into CI
  • Decision wiki for each repo
  • Two training sessions for a pilot squad
  • Playbook and before/after metrics
Monthly · 3-month minimum

Retainer

₪9,500 / month + VAT
  • 2 days a month of hands-on work
  • Decision wiki curation and cleanup
  • New skills and agents as needs change
  • Onboarding new engineers to the flow
Add-onIssues intakeSlack or email requests become specs your team approves. From ₪12,000.
Add-onOrg-wide decision wikiOne shared memory across all repos and teams. From ₪8,000.
Consulting₪600 / hourArchitecture, tooling and AI strategy advice, in prepaid 5-hour blocks.
Meet the team

Founder-led. Senior people only.

Noam Gherson

Noam Gherson

Founder & Head Engineer

Leads every project personally. Has rebuilt a company's SDLC around AI agents on a real production codebase: coding agents, a speccing agent, agent/human decision gates, and AI PR checks in CI/CD. Background in full-stack and frontend architecture (Angular, RxJS) and AWS.

LinkedIn
Dana Ben Reytan Cymerman

Dana Ben Reytan Cymerman

Brand Advisor

Thirteen years in marketing communications and branding, including seven as Marcom Manager at Cidev Group, an electronics and embedded-solutions company. Earlier roles at SOS Children's Villages, Mitrelli, Publicis and OPEN.

LinkedIn

How we staff projects

  • The founder is the lead engineer on every engagement
  • Specialist associates join when a project needs them: cloud, security, data
  • No juniors learning on your codebase

Common questions

We already use Claude Code. Why do we need this?

Having the tool isn't the same as having the workflow. The demo shows the specs, gates and review that turn usage into faster merges instead of more PRs to review.

Security won't let agents near our code.

Permissions and gates are part of the setup: what agents may touch, where a person signs off, what runs only in CI.

Does the decision wiki change things on its own?

No. Agents propose entries; a person approves each one before any agent follows it.

Taking two teams this month.

Book a 30-minute demo. You'll see the whole flow and leave with a clear idea of where to start.

Book a demo Message on WhatsApp

hello@sdlc-experts.com · Prices in NIS, before VAT.